I see the feminist mission branch out in two directions on this subject: make information and resources readily available to survivors of sexual assault and prevent assault from happening in the first place through education about consent. Advertising campaigns like the one I wrote about last time accomplish neither--they put the responsibility of preventing assault on the shoulders of the wrong people, and such a retrospective attitude about how assault can be prevented is ridiculous. (What I mean by "retrospective attitude" is the belief that after an assault has occurred, the survivor could have prevented it by making different choices in the past about their outfit, route home, drinking habits, etc and they should have been thinking whether or not this choice could result in an assault later on.)
But there is still hope! In 2011, Vancouver posted much more reasonable public service advertisements:
"Just because she isn't saying no, doesn't mean she's saying yes. Sex without consent=sexual assault. Don't be that guy."
I'm not saying this advertisement is perfect. It still presents sexual assault in a strictly gendered and heterosexual way. However, it was never too much to ask for a preventative campaign that does not blame those who have crimes committed against them. That may finally be here! Since this was two years ago, and Vancouver did experience a 10% decrease in rates of reported sexual assault crimes, perhaps it really is effective and will start to permeate the larger culture. A broader understanding of consent is something the entire world could use a double dose of, and the unfortunately small text "sex without consent=sexual assault" is, in my opinion, the most effective part of this ad.
No comments:
Post a Comment